Educational Research

Table of Contents

Click/Tap image to view article

Research Animations

Edutopia's popular collection of animations that examine 21+ studies about learning and surface findings that matter for teachers and students, all gathered in one place. Just for you.  

Research highlights effective learning methods: distractions tax working memory, inclusive education benefits disabilities, prior knowledge aids literacy, handwriting activates reading circuitry, brain breaks enhance learning, drawing boosts comprehension, and spacing learning sessions improves retention. Teacher wellness, bias in kids' books, whole-body movements for alphabet learning, the importance of recess are emphasized and much more.

Click/Tap to view a list of animations

List of Research Animations

BRAIN-BASED LEARNING

Optimizing Working Memory in the Classroom

SPECIAL EDUCATION

A Landmark Study Strikes a Resounding Note for Inclusion

LITERACY

Why Prior Knowledge Wins the Game

BRAIN-BASED LEARNING

Neuroscientists Say Don’t Write Off Handwriting

PLAY & RECESS

The Mysterious Power of Brain Breaks

CRITICAL THINKING

How Drawing Can Lead to Deeper Understanding

BRAIN-BASED LEARNING

An Authoritative Study of Two High-Impact Learning Strategies

TEACHER WELLNESS

How Set Better Boundaries With Technology

DIVERSITY

Discovering a Disturbing Bias in Kids’ Books

LITERACY

A Better Way to Learn Your ABCs

STUDENT WELLNESS

What Do Coal-Fired Power Plants Have to Do With Learning? More Than You Think

EDUCATION EQUITY

A Study Upends Stereotypes About Good Coders

CREATIVITY

The Powerful Effects of Drawing on Learning

WORLD LANGUAGES

To Teach Vocabulary, Let Students Be Thespians

PLAY & RECESS

The Importance of Recess

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING

3 Ways to Maximize Peer-to-Peer Learning

FLEXIBLE CLASSROOMS

Can Flexible Classrooms Boost Student Achievement?

HOMEWORK

Homework: How Much Is Too Much?

BRAIN-BASED LEARNING

Boosting Student Memory

LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

5 Tips for Decorating Your Classroom

WORLD LANGUAGES

The Benefits of Learning a Second Language

Source: Edutopia

Click/Tap image to view article

The Research on Life-Changing Teaching

What really moves the needle for educators and, by extension, their students? 

Being an effective teacher is about more than just improving test scores—it’s also about making a difference in students’ lives. When Edutopia asked their readers to describe the traits of a life-changing teacher, they said that great teachers make their students feel safe and loved, possess a contagious passion for learning, believe their students can succeed—and always know when to be tough to help students reach their full potential.

Click/Tap to Continue

But does the research agree? What are the fundamental levers that teachers can pull to refine their practices, improve their craft, and make a significant—or even life-altering—contribution to the lives of their students?

Edutopia reviewed nearly two dozen studies in compiling this piece—and here are the key findings. Read the entire article

1. Always Be Collecting (Targeted) Feedback

2. Attend to Relationships (and Classroom Culture)

3. Don't Give an Inch on Standards

4. Make Your Classroom Management 'Invisible'

5. Humanize Your Teaching

6. Check Your Biases

7. Authenticity + Passion = Success!

8. Close the Book on the Day

Also, learn how the eight teaching practices directly align with high quality PBL and project-based teaching. (Article by John Larmer of PBL Works)

Source: Edutopia 

Click/Tap image to view article

Effective Teacher Professional Development

In 2017 the Learning Policy Institute put out a comprehensive report on Effective Teacher Professional Development, written by Linda Darling-Hammond, Maria E. Hyler, and Madelyn Gardner, with assistance from Danny Espinoza.

After reading the report it comes down to two things that hold back most professional learning experiences:

Click/Tap to Continue

Reason #1: A lot of professional learning is "sit and get".

The report is clear. This does not usually work, unless it is to kick off follow-up active PD sessions.

In the report they identify seven factors of effective PD. Five out of the first six are specifically about active and hands on learning.

Using the methodology detailed in Appendix A, we identify seven characteristics of effective PD. Specifically, we find that it:

1. Is content focused

2. Incorporates active learning utilizing adult learning theory (can't do this in sit and get)

3. Supports collaboration, typically in job-embedded contexts (can't do this in sit and get)

4. Uses models and modeling of effective practice (can't do this in sit and get)

5. Provides coaching and expert support (can't do this in sit and get)

6. Offers opportunities for feedback and reflection (can't do this in sit and get)

We see that each characteristic is slightly different, but almost all of them cannot be successful in a "sit and get" type of learning environment. This is why the most effective PD is often an "Earn to Learn" session where both the facilitator and the learner are working to create authentic meaning out of the experience.

Reason #2: A lot of professional learning is "one and done"

The seventh characteristic of effective PD is "sustained duration". This means it cannot be a single session on a single topic. When we do this there is no research to support it being effective in any way, and is often a waste of time.

If you are leading professional learning, try to filter the experiences and sessions between these two reasons and see how it stacks up.

If you have to do a sit and get session, follow it up with a hands on experience like a design sprint, rapid prototyping session, or empathy mapping experience.

Then follow up and continue the focus of your professional learning for a sustained duration to make it effective.

Source: Learning Policy Institute & A.J. Juliani Blog

Click/Tap image to view article

The Principles of Learning

These are the first two posts in a “Principles of Learning” series written by A.J. Juliani. Each post will cover one of the 10 different principles that come directly from research and instructional practices and help all of us learn. This series is not about students. It is about all learners. Colleagues, employees, coaches, leaders, parents, teens and yes kids, can all benefit from applying the principles to craft meaningful and worthwhile learning experiences. 

Click/Tap to access the posts

What we’ve seen in the past couple of years specifically, is that the public often has misconstrued ideas on what it means to learn, and how we (as humans) can learn best. This series will hopefully shed some light, in a non-academic way, on principles that form the foundation of engaging and empowering experiences that foster deep learning.

Post #1: The Principles of Learning: It All Starts with Attention

Post #2: The Principles of Learning: Context Is Integral to Learning

Source: A.J. Juliani Blog

Click/Tap image to view article

Moving Beyond Inquiry Based Learning OR Explicit Instruction

The discussion between guided inquiry-based learning and direct instruction has too often been framed as an either/or binary. A recent debate, highlighted in the 2024 paper Beyond Inquiry or Direct Instruction: Pressing Issues for Designing Impactful Science Learning Opportunities, shifts the focus from this binary choice toward a more nuanced approach. The authors argue for blending instructional strategies depending on various contextual factors to create optimal learning outcomes.

Also see: Weighing Inquiry-Based Learning and Direct Instruction in Elementary Math |Edutopia| November 4, 2024

Click/Tap to access the posts

Inquiry vs. Direct Instruction: Is One Superior?

The paper responds to claims that direct instruction outperforms inquiry-based learning. While proponents of direct instruction cite its grounding in Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) and claim its superiority in all cases, the authors refute this by showcasing studies where inquiry-based learning is rooted in cognitive and sociocultural theories. They present evidence that inquiry-based learning supports the development of deeper conceptual knowledge and problem-solving skills, particularly when scaffolding and teacher support are provided.

Context Matters: Examples of Combined Methods

The key, according to the authors, is to identify the conditions where each method works best. In many real-world scenarios, a blend of guided inquiry and direct instruction proves most effective. The paper offers several examples of how these methods can be combined:

1. Physics: Newton’s Second Law of Motion

Direct Instruction Example: The teacher explains Newton’s second law in detail, breaking down the relationships between force, mass, and acceleration. This includes both a conceptual explanation and the formula. Students can ask questions to ensure they understand before applying the knowledge. Following this, they experiment with a practical demonstration, using a wheeled skateboard to test and verify the law in real-life conditions.

Inquiry-Based Learning Example: Students begin by asking a question: What type of motion occurs when a force is applied to an object? They then engage in experiments with the skateboard, exploring different outcomes based on their hypotheses. Instructor guidance is provided, but the focus is on the students generating content and understanding through investigation.

In both cases, students are actively engaged, whether verifying through direct application or discovering principles through inquiry. The combination provides structured learning with opportunities for deeper exploration.

2. Density in Physics

Direct Instruction Example: The concept of density is introduced through explicit teaching. The teacher explains the formula and its relationship to mass and volume. Students then apply the concept by solving problems or conducting simple experiments to confirm the formula.

Inquiry-Based Learning Example: Instead of starting with an explanation, students are tasked with experimenting with different materials to explore why some objects float while others sink. Through guided inquiry, they discover the principle of density for themselves, with teacher support.

This contrast highlights the balance between structured content delivery and active student-led investigation. Both approaches work together to enhance student understanding.

3. Project-Based Learning: Chemistry and Physics

Two large-scale studies show the advantages of project-based learning, a method combining inquiry and instruction:

Schneider et al. (2022): In this study, students explored real-world problems in chemistry, such as why table salt is safe to consume while its components are toxic. The project-based approach included experiments, modeling, and predictions, leading to better performance compared to traditional instruction.

Krajcik et al. (2022): A similar study involved students learning physics and biology through project-based inquiry. Over 2,000 students participated, and those in the project-based group outperformed their peers in traditional classrooms.

Managing Cognitive Load in Inquiry-Based Learning

A notable concern with inquiry learning is cognitive load. However, the paper discusses examples where students effectively manage cognitive demands during inquiry-based tasks. Perez et al. (2017) conducted a study on electrical circuits, demonstrating that low-prior-knowledge students who successfully learned through inquiry started with simpler tasks and took pauses to reflect on their learning. This shows that with the right scaffolding and strategies, inquiry-based learning can be just as effective as direct instruction while also promoting deeper engagement with the material.

Generative Learning Strategies

The authors also emphasize the benefits of generative learning strategies in inquiry-based learning. Research by Fiorella and Mayer (2016) shows that students benefit from engaging in activities like summarizing, explaining, and predicting, which help them organize and integrate new information with what they already know. This active construction of knowledge is key to mastering complex scientific concepts, making inquiry-based methods particularly effective in fostering long-term understanding.

Conclusion

Ultimately, this paper advocates for a flexible, research-informed approach to science instruction. Educators should leverage both inquiry-based learning and direct instruction based on the specific context, ensuring students not only absorb knowledge but also develop the skills to apply it critically. As science education continues to evolve, the key to success lies in the thoughtful combination of instructional strategies that foster deep understanding and engagement. By blending the strengths of both approaches, educators can offer students the best of both worlds, preparing them for deeper learning and real-world problem-solving.

Source: Thought Stretchers Education

Click/Tap image to view article

How the Science of Learning and Development Can Transform Education

The article from Science of Learning Development Alliance (SoLD) discusses how recent advances in the science of learning and development have significant implications for transforming education systems to support the full potential of every child. Some major findings highlighted include:

Click/Tap to access the posts

The article argues that to realize the potential of all students, education systems must be transformed based on this scientific understanding of how children actually learn and develop. Educators need to design environments, relationships and experiences tailored to each child's unique pathway.

Also see:

Source: Science of Learning Development Alliance

Click/Tap image to view article

The Myth of the Quick Learner

The study conducted by scientists at Carnegie Mellon University aimed to understand the learning strategies of rapid learners and whether these strategies could benefit others. Contrary to expectations, the researchers found no evidence of some learners progressing faster than others when analyzing the learning rates of 7,000 individuals using instructional software. Despite varying starting points, all learners made similar progress rates through well-designed practice exercises.

Click/Tap to access the posts

The research, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, challenges the notion of innate talent and emphasizes the importance of effort and effective practice. The study suggests that prior knowledge often misconstrued as faster learning, as some students may have a head start due to previous exposure to concepts.

Using educational software, researchers tracked students' progress and found that while initial accuracy rates varied widely among learners, the rate of improvement per practice attempt remained consistent across all ability levels. High achievers, starting with above-average accuracy, required fewer practice attempts to reach mastery compared to below-average students, who needed more attempts.

The study highlights the significance of well-designed practice exercises and feedback in facilitating learning. While the findings primarily apply to computerized learning environments, researchers acknowledge potential variations in learning rates in traditional settings. Memory processing speeds influenced learning rates, particularly in language learning programs.

The research suggests a shift in attitudes towards low achievers, viewing them as individuals who may need more practice opportunities rather than lacking inherent ability. The conclusion underscores the importance of practice, feedback, and effort in achieving mastery in various subjects.

Source: The Hechinger Report

Click/Tap image to view article

Social and Emotional Skills: Latest Evidence on Teachability and Impact on Life Outcomes

Education systems worldwide are increasingly acknowledging the crucial role of social and emotional skills (SES) in the development of both students and societies. The OECD has been actively involved in advancing the understanding and assessment of SES through the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES). This working paper contributes to the broader initiative of rethinking the assessment of social and emotional skills by addressing conceptual and empirical challenges.

Click/Tap to Continue

Education systems worldwide are increasingly acknowledging the crucial role of social and emotional skills (SES) in the development of both students and societies. The OECD has been actively involved in advancing the understanding and assessment of SES through the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills (SSES). This working paper contributes to the broader initiative of rethinking the assessment of social and emotional skills by addressing conceptual and empirical challenges.

As part of the project, the paper seeks to enhance clarity on various aspects related to SES. Firstly, it delves into the origins of the SSES framework for SES, addressing criticisms and responding to concerns, including those related to the utilization of the Big Five personality model. Secondly, the paper explores the teachability of SES and compares different skills in terms of their educability. Thirdly, it compiles recent evidence that sheds light on the association between SES and key life outcomes. Finally, the paper strives to bridge conceptual gaps within the literature by updating the overarching definition of SES, highlighting disparities in the definitions of specific skills, and pinpointing teachable skills with substantial predictive value. This comprehensive approach aims to strengthen the foundation for understanding and assessing SES, contributing to a more nuanced and effective educational paradigm.

Source: OECD iLibrary

Click/Tap image to view article

When researchers at the Fordham Institute asked parents to rank phrases associated with social and emotional learning, nothing seemed to add up. The term “social-emotional learning” was very unpopular; parents wanted to steer their kids clear of it. 

But when the researchers added a simple clause, forming a new phrase —”social-emotional & academic learning”— the program shot all the way up to No. 2 in the rankings.... What gives?

Click/Tap to Continue

Parents were picking up subtle cues in the list of SEL-related terms that irked or worried them, the researchers suggest. Phrases like “soft skills” and “growth mindset” felt “nebulous” and devoid of academic content. For some, the language felt suspiciously like “code for liberal indoctrination.”

But the study suggests that parents might need the simplest of reassurances to break through the political noise. Removing the jargon, focusing on productive phrases like “life skills,” and relentlessly connecting SEL to academic progress puts parents at ease—and seems to save social and emotional learning in the process.

Source: Edupedia

Click/Tap image to view article

Young Adults are Struggling with their Mental Health. Is more Childhood Independence the Answer?

Wonder why children — yours, ours, everyone’s — often seem easily flummoxed, discouraged, and young for their age? Or passive? Or just plain anxious? This blockbuster report by Holly Korbey on the KQED website is a grand tour of modern childhood and what needs to be fixed.

In a new study currently under review, Georgetown University psychologist Yulia Chentsova Dutton looked at whether American college students’ threshold for what is considered risky was comparable to their global peers. 

Click/Tap to Continue

Chentsova Dutton and her team interviewed students from Turkey, Russia, Canada and the United States, asking them to describe a risky or dangerous experience they had in the last month. Both Turkish and Russian students described witnessing events that involved actual risk: violent fights on public transportation; hazardous driving conditions caused by drunk drivers; women being aggressively followed on the street. 

But American students were far more likely to cite as dangerous things that most adults do every day, like being alone outside or riding alone in an Uber.

The American students’ risk threshold was comparatively “quite low,” according to Chentsova Dutton. Students who reported they gained independence later in childhood — going to the grocery store or riding public transportation alone, for example — viewed their university campus as more dangerous; those same students also had fewer positive emotions when describing risky situations. 

Chentsova Dutton hypothesizes that when students have fewer opportunities to practice autonomy, they have less faith in themselves that they can figure out a risky situation. “My suspicion is that low autonomy seems to translate into low efficacy,” she said. “Low efficacy and a combination of stress is associated with distress,” like anxiety and depression. Learn more by reading  the report.

Also see:

Source: KQED Website

Click/Tap image to view article

How to Get Students to Ask Good Questions, and Drive Deeper Learning

It won’t come as a huge surprise to educators: Sometimes good questions are more productive than right answers.

That was the conclusion of a 2020 study, too. Students who studied a topic and then composed their own questions scored 14 percentage points higher on a test than students who used passive strategies like studying their notes and rereading materials. Creating questions, the researchers found, not only encouraged students to think more deeply about the topic but also strengthened their ability to remember the material.

  Click/Tap to Continue

Quality matters, and you can move kids from simple yes/no questions to more penetrating inquiry by guiding them toward questions that start with “explain,” or that use “how” and “why” framing. Alternatively, you can use class time to identify the characteristics of higher-order questions—those that require analysis or synthesis, for example—then collect student questions and discuss them as a group.

Source: Edutopia & Wiley Online Library

Click/Tap image to view article

We Drastically Underestimate the Importance of Brain Breaks

When it comes to optimizing learning, we don’t value breaks enough, neuroscientists suggest in a new study.  It was discovered that after learning new information, our brains continue to whir, using cognitive downtime as a virtual staging ground to process, organize, and integrate learned information. The key, lies in neural replay, the “temporally compressed reactivation of neural activity patterns representing behavioral sequences during rest.” In other words, after practicing a skill, our brains rapidly cycle through the experience, compressing and imprinting the material to optimize storage and recall.

  Click/Tap to Continue

Practice makes perfect. To become ambidextrous in basketball, dribble with your left hand, switch to your right, and repeat the process again and again. Likewise, to solve differential equations in math, pile them up and work your way through them diligently.

According to one popular school of thought, it’s this active, repeated manipulation of material that lays the neural foundations for skill development. All too often, time away from the basketball court—or the math books—is seen as a break in the learning process, a way to cool off, reenergize, and then return to the vital work of actual practice.

But for Leonardo Cohen, a neuroscientist at the National Institutes of Health and the senior author of a June 2021 study published in the journal Cell, the idea that breaks are a cooling-off period is a misconception.

Source: Edutopia

Click/Tap image to view article

​The Future of Educational Leadership: Five Signposts

The intention of this paper is to reflect on the nature of the leadership required at a most pivotal time in human history: an era of existential threat through climate crisis; the perils of pandemics; violent conflict; declining democracy; and widening divides – set against the immense possibilities becoming available. The purpose in this paper is to indicate the direction such leadership should take. The paper offers five ‘signposts’ to that direction.

Click/Tap to Continue

The Five Signposts

Leaders in the future need to be advocates for inclusion and diversity, for racial equality; fiercely anti-racist and anti-sexist; agents of change, activists intervening to attack institutional barriers to equity and achieve the power shifts that are necessary to produce justice for all. In the everyday running of schools, the very essence of the culture and ensuing policies and practice needs an equity lens.

Source: Association of Independent Schools of South Australia

Click/Tap image to view article

Index For Inclusion: Developing Learning and Participation in Schools

The Index is a resource to support the inclusive development of schools. It is a comprehensive document that can help everyone to find their own next steps in developing their setting. The materials are designed to build on the wealth of knowledge and experience that people have about their practice. They challenge and support the development of any school, however 'inclusive' it is thought to be currently.

Click/Tap to Continue

Inclusion is often associated with students who have impairments or students seen as 'having special educational needs'. However, in the Index, inclusion is about the education of all children and young people. Read the entire document here.

Source: Published by the Center for Studies on Inclusive Education (CSIE)

Click/Tap image to view article

Immigrant students are sometimes portrayed as a costly expense to the education system, but new research is systematically dismantling that myth.

In a 2021 study, researchers analyzed over 1.3 million academic and birth records for students in Florida communities and concluded that the presence of immigrant students actually has “a positive effect on the academic achievement of U.S.-born students,” raising test scores as the size of the immigrant school population increases. The benefits were especially powerful for low-income students.

Click/Tap to Continue

While immigrants initially “face challenges in assimilation that may require additional school resources,” the researchers concluded, hard work and resilience may allow them to excel and thus “positively affect exposed U.S.-born students’ attitudes and behavior.” But according to teacher Larry Ferlazzo, the improvements might stem from the fact that having English language learners in classes improves pedagogy, pushing teachers to consider “issues like prior knowledge, scaffolding, and maximizing accessibility.”

Source: Edupedia

Click/Tap image to view article

Affirming Identity in Multilingual Classrooms

By welcoming a student's home language into the classroom, schools actively engage English language learners in literacy.

In How People Learn, Bransford, Brown, and Cocking (2000) synthesized research regarding the optimal conditions that foster learning; a follow-up volume edited by Donovan and Bransford (2005) examines the application of these learning principles to teaching history, mathematics, and science. 

Click/Tap to Continue

Bransford and colleagues emphasize the following three conditions for effective learning: engaging prior understandings and background knowledge, integrating factual knowledge with conceptual frameworks by encouraging deep understanding, and supporting students in taking active control over the learning process.

Any instructional intervention that claims scientific credibility should reflect these principles, which are particularly important when it comes to English language learners. Prior knowledge refers not only to information or skills previously acquired in formal instruction but also to the totality of the experiences that have shaped the learner's identity and cognitive functioning. In classrooms with students from linguistically diverse backgrounds, instruction should explicitly activate this knowledge.

Source: ASCD Website - September 1, 2005

Click/Tap image to view article

It’s time to rethink our definition of what a “good school” is, researchers assert in a study published in late 2020.⁣ That’s because typical measures of school quality like test scores often provide an incomplete and misleading picture, the researchers found.

The study looked at over 150,000 ninth-grade students who attended Chicago public schools and concluded that emphasizing the social and emotional dimensions of learning—relationship-building, a sense of belonging, and resilience, for example—improves high school graduation and college matriculation rates for both high- and low-income students, beating out schools that focus primarily on improving test scores.⁣

Click/Tap to Continue

“Schools that promote socio-emotional development actually have a really big positive impact on kids,” said lead researcher C. Kirabo Jackson in an interview with Edutopia. “And these impacts are particularly large for vulnerable student populations who don’t tend to do very well in the education system.”

The findings reinforce the importance of a holistic approach to measuring student progress and are a reminder that schools—and teachers—can influence students in ways that are difficult to measure, and may only materialize well into the future.⁣

Source: Edupedia

Click/Tap image to view article

How Do Public and Private Schools Differ in OECD Countries?

The OECD's report on private schools reveals that, across its member countries, private schools enroll approximately 18% of students from pre-primary to upper secondary education, with 44 million students attending private schools in 2021. The distribution varies among countries, often influenced by historical, religious, or choice-related factors. 

Contrary to the belief that private school enrollment is increasing, the share has remained relatively constant over the last decade. 

Click/Tap to Continue

Funding for private schools is diverse, with 42% of upper secondary level funding coming from private sources, mainly tuition fees. Private schools generally exhibit greater autonomy and face fewer shortages than public schools, as evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

However, disparities in material and resource shortages, teacher shortages, and social diversity objectives exist between private and public schools. While private schools often achieve better results in PISA assessments, this is attributed to enrolling more students from advantaged socio-economic backgrounds. 

The report underscores the challenge of enhancing social diversity in both public and private schools, emphasizing the need for efforts to address this over the past decade.

Source: OCEDiLibrary

Click/Tap image to view article

A future for the World's Children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission Report

Despite dramatic improvements in survival, nutrition, and education over recent decades, today’s children face an uncertain future. Climate change, ecological degradation, migrating populations, conflict, pervasive inequalities, and predatory commercial practices threaten the health and future of children in every country. In 2015, the world’s countries agreed on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), yet nearly 5 years later, few countries have recorded much progress towards achieving them. 

Click/Tap to Continue

The Lancet Commission presents the case for placing children, aged 0–18 years, at the centre of the SDGs: at the heart of the concept of sustainability and our shared human endeavour. Governments must harness coalitions across sectors to overcome ecological and commercial pressures to ensure children receive their rights and entitlements now and a liveable planet in the years to come.

February 2020


Source: ReseachGate Website
Click/Tap image to view article

Want Resilient and Well-Adjusted Kids? Let Them Play

By Jackie Mader | November 14, 2022

Research shows play has enormous learning and social benefits across all ages. 

The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit newsroom dedicated to education, explored the vital role of play in child development, highlighting the findings of Dr. Stuart Brown and other experts. Dr. Brown’s research began in the 1960s, after a commission investigating mass shooter Charles Whitman noted Whitman’s lack of play in childhood.

Click/Tap to Continue

This insight led Brown to study the impact of play deprivation on incarcerated individuals, finding that those with limited play opportunities often struggled with social connections and empathy.

Play, experts assert, is essential for cognitive, social, and emotional growth. Research shows that play, particularly unstructured play, helps children develop resilience, emotional regulation, and social skills. Chemicals like oxytocin and dopamine, which are released during play, foster these skills and promote positive emotions. Studies with animals and children reveal that play strengthens brain connections crucial for problem-solving, memory, and language.

However, play opportunities are dwindling due to structured academic pressures and the lasting effects of the pandemic, which kept many children indoors. Experts argue that play should be reintegrated into classrooms, not just as recess but as a learning tool. "Guided play" — activities with learning goals that encourage exploration — has shown particular promise in teaching concepts like math and engineering. Experts such as Doris Bergen and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek believe that play is not peripheral but fundamental to learning, helping children internalize knowledge, problem-solve, and develop perseverance.


Source: The Hechinger Report
Click/Tap image to view article

The Power of Play-Based Learning 

By Andrew Boryga | Edutopia | August 5, 2022. 

New research shows play-based learning can be more effective than direct instruction at improving outcomes for early learners—particularly in the development of mathematical and spatial skills. 

The mere presence of the word play in the teaching method known as play-based learning can alarm some parents of early childhood learners. Students, even our youngest students, should be “playing” at home. They come to school to learn, they might say.

Click/Tap to Continue

That distinction—between “learning” and “play”—is a false one, according to early childhood educator and author Erika Christakis. Although kindergarten and elementary classrooms often devalue it in favor of direct instruction or seat time, play is the “defining feature” of all mammalian development, and its “signature” is apparent in the bodies and lives of little kids who experience it: “Their life expectancies are longer and their social-emotional capabilities are more robust when they have a chance to learn through play and deep relationships, and when their developing brains are given the chance to grow in a nurturing, language-rich, and relatively unhurried environment,” Christakis told Edutopia in a 2019 interview.

Children aren’t miniature adults. Nonetheless, a bias toward adult perspectives of childhood, with its attendant schedules and routines, has gradually exerted a stranglehold on our educational system, Christakis continues, trapping young kids in educational spaces that too often feel dreary, joyless, and alienating. “The notion that there is something of value in being a little kid—with little kid desires and, above all, needs—seems to have fallen out of favor.”

Breaking the Cycle

Despite the clear benefits of play, setting aside the time for even the youngest students can seem out of step with the academic demands of the school day. Early childhood teachers are pressured to meet strict seat-time guidelines in their classrooms, and they often feel that direct instruction is the best method to achieve the many curricular objectives that parents, principals, and other leaders expect.

According to a new study, there’s a middle path. A group of researchers from the University of Cambridge analyzed decades of research on “guided play”—more commonly called play-based learning—and concluded that it can have a “greater positive effect” on the acquisition of skills like math, shape knowledge, and task switching than more traditional approaches that prioritize seat time and explicit instruction.

“In redefining play as a spectrum with varying degrees of child autonomy and adult guidance, guided play has been situated as a ‘middle-ground’ between free play and direct instruction,” the researchers concluded. The learning is inherently rich and meaningful because “play naturally cultivates their enjoyment, motivation, and agency; while the inclusion of guidance by a supportive adult extends the scope for learning beyond what the child might achieve on their own.”

Incorporating key elements of play—like wonder, exploration, and student agency—into loosely structured lessons that are gently supported by teachers provides an “optimal” approach for students, according to the researchers. For Christakis, this means that play-based learning experiences should provide students with a “steady diet of free, unstructured time and access to open-ended materials” that allow them to engage in “rambling” storytelling and provide plenty of time to just “mess around and make their own rules.”

Play, with an Objective in Mind

In a successful play-based learning class, teachers often have a clear “learning goal” behind the play they let students engage in ahead of time, according to the Cambridge study. A teacher should keep this goal in mind during the play and subtly guide the child toward the goal.

Don’t pull the strings too tight: According to primary teacher Maggie Sabin, teachers shouldn’t necessarily expect students to produce specific outputs. For example, to teach students how colors can be mixed to form new colors, you might avoid giving students instructions to mix specific colors and instead model one example and then allow them to make their own combinations. “Be well prepared and intentional in planning, but allow for flexibility and inspiration,” writes Sabin.

One way to make sure that students are playing with purpose is to structure your classroom with deliberate spaces or centers containing materials, games, or objects intentionally chosen for students to engage with and make sense of.

An area in Sabin’s classroom, for example, contains a “tinker tray” of items that might seem random but are related to lessons or units she is using direct instruction to guide students through. During a unit on nature and natural materials, for example, the tray is stocked with items like pebbles, leaves, or sticks that students can both practice naming and manipulating. The materials can also be used to practice early math skills through the course of play by simply asking students how many pebbles they have or how many pebbles they have left after giving some to a friend.

Providing Choice and Agency

Effective play-based learning should be child-led when possible and give students “freedom and choice over their actions and play behavior,” the researchers assert. However, their findings suggest that the level of autonomy being given to students in play-based learning scenarios is often less than the amount needed to “cultivate children’s agency, motivation, and curiosity.”

To foster that agency, San Jose Unified School District kindergarten teacher Jessica Arrow often starts the day by allowing students 30 to 45 minutes of “choice time” to explore various spaces in the classroom—a block center, math center, science center, art center, book nook, or dramatic play corner.

The items they encounter are related to previous lessons and the interests her students have expressed. For example, after reading the children’s book Miss Maple’s Seeds, Arrow said, her students became fascinated by the author’s process of creating the book from her imagination. As a result, Arrow’s art center included materials for students to create stories of their own and to practice speaking, listening, and writing standards in the process.

Arrow writes that their bookmaking interests eventually carried over into other areas of learning. For example, one student created a number book. After Arrow shared it with the class, number books became popular, and her students were referencing number grids and creating their own number books that helped them count and identify large numbers in the process.

“Once my students had experienced play-based learning, they were more focused, motivated, and purposeful,” writes Arrow. “Most important, they were happier. Bringing play-based learning to my classroom created balance, deepened our learning, and defined our classroom community as a place where we could learn and grow together.”

When to Step In

As children play, teachers should be observing closely to gather insights about the way students are learning and use open-ended questions, hints, and prompts to gently nudge students and encourage deeper thinking. You might step in “when a child appears to find an activity too difficult or too easy” so that you “can help them learn beyond what might be possible in independent play,” the researchers say.

For example, when children are playing with blocks, open-ended questions can be posed to encourage problem-solving, prediction, and hypothesizing, according to veteran teacher and curriculum manager for Edmentum Winnie O’Leary. A teacher can bring awareness to math standards by asking students low-stakes questions such as “I wonder how tall this tower can get?” or “I wonder how many blocks you need to make that tower as tall as your friend’s?”

Simple questions can also encourage practice recalling information and identifying shapes, objects, or colors, according to O’Leary. During a game of Go Fish, for example, you can ask, “Hey, who had the number 4 in the last round?” Or during a game of Uno you might ask, “Hmm, what color card do you need to add to the center deck?” Games involving strategy—like checkers or tic-tac-toe—are great to get students thinking critically about their objectives and how to adjust them based on what is happening during the game. Try questions like “I wonder what move you could have made to win?”

Use these strategies wisely, though, the researchers caution. In the end, hints and questions should not feel like directives.

Christakis agrees, telling Edutopia that she often coaches teachers to stay away from “checking questions” such as “What color is the apple?” or “What are you drawing?” Instead, she says, teachers should ask questions like “Tell me about your drawing.”

“The open-ended response really opens up a huge space for spontaneous and deep learning,” Christakis says.


Source: Edutopia
Click/Tap image to view article

Kids Can Learn More From Guided Play Than From Direct Instruction

By Jackie Mader | The Hechinger Report | March 24, 2022. 

A review of seventeen studies found that guided play is as good as or better than adult-led, direct instruction. What happens when you stop teaching young children via direct instruction and instead set up purposeful opportunities to play? They could learn just as much—or more— when it comes to literacy, numeracy and executive function skills critical to early academic success, according to a new review of 17 studies of play.

Click/Tap to Continue

Researchers looked at 39 studies of play and included 17 in a meta-analysis that found when children ages three to eight engage in guided play, they can learn just as much in some domains of literacy and executive function as children who receive direct instruction from a teacher or adult. (The studies that were excluded did not fit the review’s criteria of assessing child learning and development outcomes.) Guided play, unlike free play, means there is a learning goal set by an adult and children are ‘gently steered to explore. The study found children also learned slightly more in some areas of numeracy, like knowledge of shapes, and showed a greater mastery of some behavioral skills, like being able to switch tasks.

These findings, which were published in the journal, Child Development, add to a growing body of research that has found play is not simply a carefree tangent to learning, but rather an effective way to teach important early skills. Continue reading.

**More information about 'Play'

Click/Tap image to view article

Nine Principles of Ideal Learning - Early Years 

Drawing from the strength of world-renowned early childhood approaches including Montessori, Reggio Emilia, Friends Center for Children, Tools of the Mind, Bank Street College of Education, and Waldorf, these nine principles outline core concepts that create ideal learning environments for young children across settings. They allow for multiple approaches, models, and traditions, and take into account the varied contexts within which early educators and care providers work. Several essential beliefs weave throughout, including a commitment to play, relationship-based interactions, an ecologically-focused, child-centered perspective; equity; and a strength-based and inquiry-based approach with children, adults and families. Together, they balance principles of attachment and independence that are meaningful for young children’s development.

Click/Tap to Continue

Children Are Born Learning, Exploring and Growing

How children develop depends on us. We know that during the first few years of life, more than 1 million neural connections are formed every second. Young children develop through rich, daily interactions with nurturing caregivers and educators, building brains and shaping physical, socioemotional and cognitive development for life. These early years represent a unique, flexible period of human development and a finite window for high-impact investment.

Early learning environments shape children’s present and future through mechanisms scientists continue to discover — from statistical learning to nervous system attunement to epigenetics. Because children are born learning, any environment can become an ideal learning environment — whether at home, in family- or center-based child care, or at school. While every child should have access to ideal learning environments from birth, far too many do not. With growing public investment, we now have the opportunity to create equitable ideal learning environments serving children, families and educators in any setting.

Additional Resources


Source: Trust For Learning
Click/Tap image to view article

Some of the most popular and well-regarded children’s books—Caldecott and Newbery honorees among them—persistently depict Black, Asian, and Hispanic characters with lighter skin, according to new research.

Using artificial intelligence, researchers combed through 1,130 children’s books written in the last century, comparing two sets of diverse children’s books—one a collection of popular books that garnered major literary awards, the other favored by identity-based awards. The software analyzed data on skin tone, race, age, and gender.

Click/Tap to Continue

Among the findings: While more characters with darker skin color begin to appear over time, the most popular books—those most frequently checked out of libraries and lining classroom bookshelves—continue to depict people of color in lighter skin tones. More insidiously, when adult characters are “moral or upstanding,” their skin color tends to appear lighter, the study’s lead author, Anjali Aduki, told The 74, with some books converting “Martin Luther King Jr.’s chocolate complexion to a light brown or beige.” Female characters, meanwhile, are often seen but not heard.

Cultural representations are a reflection of our values, the researchers conclude: “Inequality in representation, therefore, constitutes an explicit statement of inequality of value.”

Source: Edupedia

Click/Tap image to view article

Many classrooms today still look like they did 100 years ago, when students were preparing for factory jobs. But the world’s moved on: Modern careers demand a more sophisticated set of skills—collaboration, advanced problem-solving, and creativity, for example—and those can be difficult to teach in classrooms that rarely give students the time and space to develop those competencies.

Project-based learning (PBL) would seem like an ideal solution. But critics say PBL places too much responsibility on novice learners, ignoring the evidence about the effectiveness of direct instruction and ultimately undermining subject fluency.

Click/Tap to Continue

Advocates counter that student-centered learning and direct instruction can and should coexist in classrooms.

Now two new large-scale studies—encompassing over 6,000 students in 114 diverse schools across the nation—provide evidence that a well-structured, project-based approach boosts learning for a wide range of students.

In the studies, which were funded by Lucas Education Research, a sister division of Edutopia, elementary and high school students engaged in challenging projects that had them designing water systems for local farms or creating toys using simple household objects to learn about gravity, friction, and force. Subsequent testing revealed notable learning gains—well above those experienced by students in traditional classrooms—and those gains seemed to raise all boats, persisting across socioeconomic class, race, and reading levels.

Source: Edupedia

Click/Tap image to view article

This article by A.J. Juliani is for those that need more resources about inquiry-driven education, and for those trying to get research to back them up when bringing it to a leader, school board, parent committee, or even colleagues.

The article sheds some light on the research behind choice, and more broadly, inquiry-driven education. Juliani says it’s easy for him to praise Genius Hour because he's done it in the classroom, and seen many other teachers do it successfully with their students. However, he also understands that if you have not had that experience, it may be difficult to justify. 

Click/Tap to Continue

The article is separated into four sections:

Also read: PBL vs Doing The Same Thing: The Research Is Clear by A. J. Juliani

Source: A. J. Juliani

Click/Tap image to view article

Timed Tests Are a Habit We Can’t Seem to Quit

Timed tests are entrenched in the school system, but they aren’t a fair or accurate reflection of students’ mastery and content knowledge, a 2020 review of dozens of studies concludes. They provoke anxiety and exclude far too many kids—including students with disabilities, English language learners, and those who simply need more time (and that’s most of us).

“Speed and intelligence are not very highly correlated,” the researchers note, echoing a plea voiced by educators and researchers for decades. The answer is refreshingly simple: “The best way to improve a time-limited test’s reliability is simply to remove its time limits.” 

Click/Tap to Continue

 Doing so improves the validity of tests - probably because with more time students can read instructions more closely, check their work, and keep their anxiety under control. “As instructors, we are not assessed by how speedily we can demonstrate our mastery,” the researchers conclude. “Why then do we continue to administer time- limited exams, which are less valid, less reliable, less inclusive, and less equitable?”

Source: Edutopia